Incentivize Owners to Sell Their Homes
Recent tax law changes and home price inflation has eroded the value of federal tax incentives for individuals selling their homes, especially for older homeowners who have lived in their home for 20 years or more. Many of these homeowners who are considering downsizing or moving to a retirement facility are facing gains well in excess of current exclusions, which can leave them owing many thousands of dollars in tax and reduces their ability to afford their new home. Couple that with higher interest rates than we have seen in the past decade, and we are faced with many homeowners making a decision not to sell their home.
Additionally, some 10 million owner-occupied homes were purchased by investors of all types and sizes and converted to rentals in the wake of the housing crisis of 2008, significantly lowering the supply of homes available for purchase. These investor-owners are also getting older and are interested in exiting the housing provider space, but again are limited by the tax implications of selling an investment property.
New Virginia tax incentives (housing tax credit, recordation tax exemption, etc) aimed at unlocking a segment of inventory previously unavailable to prospective buyers would help to unlock housing inventory desperately needed for those who want to live and work in our Commonwealth.
NVAR recommends creating a tax incentive for landlords who sell their investment property to the current tenants renting the property. This incentive would prevent displacement while incentivizing owners to sell to mostly first-time homebuyers.
NVAR also recommends providing incentives to individuals who sell their principal residence to buyers who will utilize the home as a principal residence. This incentive would preserve owner-occupied housing stock and prevent institutional investors from scooping up all of the available housing.
Prefunded Veteran Property Tax Exemption
Under the Virginia Constitution, for any dwelling that is the principal residence of a Veteran with a 100% service-connected, permanent and total disability, the surviving spouse of such veterans, or the surviving spouse of any member of the United States armed forces who was killed in action, is eligible for a property tax exemption. Currently, disabled veterans and their spouse cannot apply for their exemption until after they own the home. Because they are not exempt during the underwriting process, taxes have to be counted against them when qualifying for their mortgage. Thousands of dollars are collected at closing to pay tax bills that will simply be refunded at a later date.
NVAR supports legislation to allow disabled veterans and surviving spouses to apply for the real estate tax exemption after going under contract, but prior to taking ownership and getting to the closing table. This change will increase the buying power of disabled veterans and surviving spouse by tens of thousands of dollars.
Statewide Accessory Dwelling Development
Recent nationwide trends have shown that allowing accessory dwelling units is an achievable first step for increasing market-rate affordable housing options within traditional single-family neighborhoods. Accessory dwellings are an attractive option to expand attainable housing options within existing neighborhoods predominantly characterized by single-family dwellings, as well as to stabilize neighborhoods where an increase in equity and income for homeowners can ease potential displacement pressures. This is because accessory units in most localities can be rented out as an additional source of income. They are generally more affordable than other forms of housing because they are smaller and can be built relatively quickly without the same expense as other housing forms. Local regulations and community resistance (NIMBYism) significantly hinder the construction of accessory dwellings, and construction financing can also be a barrier, particularly since many lenders do not view accessory dwellings as a formal housing unit.
Without guidance from the General Assembly, localities are left to implement varying ordinances that confuse homeowners, home buyers and developers and suppress the access and availability of accessory dwellings. Without action by the General Assembly, action is left to local elected officials who are limited in their actions by the vocal minority of residents who do not support any development in single-family neighborhoods.
NVAR recommends statewide enabling legislation which permits the by-right development of an accessory dwelling unit located within any single-family dwelling and requires localities to adopt administrative approval processes for all attached and detached accessory dwellings.
Reform Inclusionary Zoning Enabling Legislation
Inclusionary zoning policies allow local governments to use their land use regulatory powers to require or incentivize the production of affordable housing. The Nation’s first inclusionary zoning ordinance, still in effect today, was adopted right here in Fairfax County, in 1971. Since then, more than 800 communities across the country have adopted inclusionary zoning policies.
However, only a handful of Virginia localities (fewer than 20) have inclusionary zoning ordinances. In Virginia, localities are permitted to adopt inclusionary zoning programs under Virginia Code § 15.2-2304. This law permits adoption of inclusionary zoning ordinances that offer builders a density bonus in return for developing moderately priced housing but allows flexibility for localities to tailor their inclusionary zoning programs to local needs and considerations, including parameters of both density bonuses and number requirements for affordable units. This power is limited, applicable to certain large counties and cities in Virginia. In all other Virginia localities, a more prescriptive and restrictive Virginia Code §15.2-2305 governs inclusionary zoning programs which is a barrier to localities adopting inclusionary zoning as part of their local housing solutions.
NVAR recommends amending Virginia Code § 15.2-2304 to apply to all local jurisdictions across the state, rather than only a handful of localities, while also establishing a statewide definition of housing affordability to provide certainty and guidance to localities in establishing their own inclusionary zoning policies.